1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 17 F.Supp.
  5. 17 F.Supp. 18 (1936)
 

STEEL STAMPING CO. v. N. N. HILL BRASS CO.

No. 2413.

17 F.Supp. 18 (1936)

STEEL STAMPING CO. v. N. N. HILL BRASS CO.

District Court, D. Connecticut.

January 9, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kwis, Hudson & Kent, of Cleveland, Ohio (A. J. Hudson, of Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel), and Rockwell & Bartholow, of New Haven, Conn. (Edmond M. Bartholow, of New Haven, Conn., of counsel) for plaintiff.

Howson & Howson, of New York City (Hubert Howson, of New York City, of counsel), and George D. Seymour, of New Haven, Conn., for defendant.

I. Findings of Fact.

HINCKS, District Judge.

1. This is a suit brought by a toy manufacturer, charging infringement of its patent No. 1,777,427, issued March 7, 1930, upon the application of one Bregman, filed March 6, 1924, covering an invention relating to toy telephones. The plaintiff relies upon claims 16, 18, 19, 20, and 21, each of which discloses a combination consisting of a toy telephone of the dial type, comprising three elements as follows: (1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases