1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 14 F.Supp.
  5. 14 F.Supp. 21 (1936)
 

CANDAS v. AGNINI

14 F.Supp. 21 (1936)

CANDAS et al. v. AGNINI et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

January 13, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pennie, Davis, Marvin & Edmonds, of New York City (Ernest H. Merchant, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

John M. Cole, of New York City (Joshua R. H. Potts, Eugene Vincent Clarke, and Basel H. Brune, all of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for defendants.

CAFFEY, District Judge.

The plaintiffs have furnished no evidence. They rest on the affidavits submitted by the defendants. Even so, the case is close.

The sole issue which has been discussed by counsel is whether, when Michaels was served with process, the defendant firm had a "regular and established place of business" in this district.

The plaintiffs rely chiefly on International Harvester Co. v. Kentucky, 234 U.S. 579

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases