IN RE ENGLANDER SPRING BED CO.

No. 30095.

17 F.Supp. 15 (1936)

In re ENGLANDER SPRING BED CO., Inc.

District Court, E. D. New York.

September 18, 1936.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lewis, Marks & Kanter, of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Lloyd B. Kanter, of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for debtor, for the motion.

Edwin M. Slote, of New York City, for Creditors' Committee, supporting the motion.

Zalkin & Cohen, of New York City (I. Akselrod, of New York City, of counsel), for Brooklyn Mortgage Creditors, opposed.

Austin & Du Pont, of Jamaica, L. I., N. Y., for certificate holder Mary E. Steel, opposed.

Harry Fogler, of New York City, for Newburgh Woodlawn Cemetery Ass'n, opposed.

William A. Hyman, of New York City, for Ætna Life Ins. Co., claimant opposing allowances.

Gilbert D. Steiner, by E. M. Bokor, both of New York City, for certificate holder opposed.

J. Franklin Tausch, of New York City, for preferred stockholders.

C. Elmer Spedick, of Brooklyn, N. Y., by G. A. Cartier, for Title Guarantee & Trust Co., for certificate holder opposed.

William E. Lowther, by A. Johnson, both of New York City, for creditors.

Harold Tesler, of New York City, for New York Credit Men's Collection Division.

Seligsberg & Lewis, of New York City, for Giddens.

Martin M. Goldman, of New York City, member of Creditors' Committee.

Lester M. Levin, of New York City, for National Labor Relations Board.

Hughes, Schurman & Dwight and J. D. McCauley, all of New York City, for Bond & Mortgage Guarantee Corporation.

Duberstein & Schwartz, of Brooklyn, N. Y., for Myron Krieger.

James B. Alley, Gen. Counsel, Max O'Rell Truitt, Solicitor, and William Radner, all of Washington, D. C., and Lee Walker, Rex Bullinger, and Arthur A. Armstrong, all of Chicago, Ill., for objector Reconstruction Finance Corporation.


CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is a motion to approve of the proposed plan of reorganization offered by the debtor as amended and for allowances.

No one appeared in opposition to the motion to approve plan except on behalf of the certificate holders of the first mortgage, and the only brief submitted on their behalf being that submitted by the attorneys for the Brooklyn mortgage creditors.

Their objection...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases