1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 81 F.2d
  5. 81 F.2d 233 (1936)
 

IN RE MILLER

Patent Appeal No. 3575.

81 F.2d 233 (1936)

In re MILLER.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

January 27, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dyrenforth, Lee, Chritton & Wiles, of Chicago, Ill. (John H. Lee and B. A. Schroeder, both of Chicago, Ill., and Nelson J. Jewett, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

R. F. Whitehead, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

BLAND, Associate Judge.

Claims 3, 6, 11, 12, and 13 (being all the claims) in appellant's application for a patent directed to a deposit safe were rejected by the Primary Examiner of the United States Patent Office, which rejection, upon appeal to the Board of Appeals, was affirmed, and appellant has appealed to this court. The rejected claims follow:

"3. A deposit-safe comprising an anchor block; a heavy-walled container embedded in said block and having...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases