1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 84 F.2d
  5. 84 F.2d 221 (1936)
 

IN RE REICHEL

Patent Appeal No. 3634.

84 F.2d 221 (1936)

In re REICHEL.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

June 17, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McConkey & Smith, of Washington, D. C. (Stephen Cerstvik, of East Orange, N. J., and N. D. Parker, Jr., of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

R. F. Whitehead, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming the decision of the Examiner rejecting all of the claims of appellant's application, four in number, for want of patentability in view of the prior art.

Claim 1 is illustrative of the claims on appeal, and reads as follows: "1. An expansible diaphragm device comprising means providing a chamber and including a supporting shell,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases