1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 83 F.2d
  5. 83 F.2d 217 (1936)
 

SMITH v. HALL

No. 251.

83 F.2d 217 (1936)

SMITH v. HALL et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

April 6, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur E. Paige and Frank E. Paige, both of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants.

Albert L. Ely, of Akron, Ohio, Edmond M. Bartholow, of New Haven, Conn., and Geo. C. McConnaughey, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

This suit is for infringement of claim 11 of patent No. 1,262,860, issued April 16, 1918, on an application filed October 26, 1916, for a method for the incubation of eggs. This claim was held valid and infringed in Smith v. Snow, 294 U.S. 1, 55 S.Ct. 279, 79 L.Ed. 721, and Waxham v. Smith, 294 U.S. 20, 55 S.Ct. 277, 79 L.Ed. 733. It embraces a method...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases