AMERICAN PROPELLER & MFG. CO. v. UNITED STATES

No. B-28.

17 F.Supp. 215 (1936)

AMERICAN PROPELLER & MFG. CO. v. UNITED STATES.

Court of Claims.

October 5, 1936.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Kemp Bartlett, of Baltimore, Md. (Williams, Myers & Quiggle, of Washington, D. C., and Bartlett, Poe & Claggett, of Baltimore, Md., on the briefs), for plaintiff.

George H. Foster, of Washington, D. C., and Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.

Before BOOTH, Chief Justice, and GREEN, LITTLETON, WILLIAMS, and WHALEY, Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Both plaintiff and defendant have filed motions to set aside the judgment and grant a new trial. The argument upon these motions raises some questions that were not before presented by counsel or considered in the original opinion, and as to which it may be well to state something further.

The plaintiff does not now ask that interest should be computed on the amount of its recovery, but contends that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases