1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 86 F.2d
  5. 86 F.2d 120 (1936)
 

UNITED STATES NARDONE v. KELLY

No. 175.

86 F.2d 120 (1936)

UNITED STATES ex rel. NARDONE v. KELLY, Marshal, et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

November 2, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis Halle, of New York City, for relator.

Lamar Hardy, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Lester C. Dunigan, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for respondents.

Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Identification of the appellant as the person named in the indictment was sufficiently established by testimony independent of the testimony received and obtained through wire tapping. Probable cause was shown by the introduction into evidence of a certified copy of the indictment. We express no opinion as to the competency of the additional evidence of identification received by reason of tapping telephone wires and hearing the voice and conversation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases