1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 81 F.2d
  5. 81 F.2d 105 (1936)
 

CHALAIRE v. FRANKLIN

No. 7753.

81 F.2d 105 (1936)

CHALAIRE v. FRANKLIN.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied February 24, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Farnham P. Griffiths, George E. Dane, and McCutchen, Olney, Mannon & Greene, all of San Francisco, Cal., Walter Chalaire, of New York City, and Paul F. Faison, of Shanghai, China, for appellant.

Franklin & Harrington, and Cornell S. Franklin, all of Shanghai, China, and Frank E. Hinckley and W. H. Lawrence, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before WILBUR, MATHEWS, and HANEY, Circuit Judges.

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

Appellant brought this action to recover of appellee the sum of 47,774.12 Shanghai taels claimed by appellant under a written contract. The action was commenced on February 21, 1934. Thereafter appellant filed an amended complaint, which appellee answered. Both parties then moved for judgment on the pleadings. The trial court granted appellee's motion and rendered judgment dismissing the action. This appeal is from that judgment.

Appellee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases