1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 87 F.2d
  5. 87 F.2d 98 (1936)
 

LOEBER HAIR GOODS CO. v. H. W. GOSSARD CO.

No. 6992.

87 F.2d 98 (1936)

LOEBER HAIR GOODS CO. v. H. W. GOSSARD CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied December 16, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City (Kwis, Hudson & Kent and Bernsteen & Bernsteen, all of Cleveland, Ohio, and Floyd H. Crews, of New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Hugh M. Morris, of Wilmington, Del. (Bates, Golrick & Teare, of Cleveland, Ohio, Hugh M. Morris, of Wilmington, Del., and Lawrence K. Sager and Donald Malcolm, both of New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Before MOORMAN, HICKS, and SIMONS, Circuit Judges.

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

Suit by the H. W. Gossard Company, appellee, against Loeber Hair Goods Company, appellant, for infringement of letters patent No. 1,859,198, May 17, 1932, to K. E. Cunningham for a "Combination Garment" and assigned to appellee. Claims 3 and 4 only are involved. The District Court sustained the claims. If they are valid, infringement is admitted.

The patent relates to a garment for women, and the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases