1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 81 F.2d
  5. 81 F.2d 41 (1936)
 

ILLINOIS WATCH CASE CO. v. HINGECO MFG. CO.

No. 3037.

81 F.2d 41 (1936)

ILLINOIS WATCH CASE CO. et al. v. HINGECO MFG. CO., Inc., et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

January 7, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel W. Banning, of Chicago, Ill. (Ephraim Banning, of Chicago, Ill., Harry Lea Dodson, of New York City, and Thomas A. Jenckes, of Providence, R. I., on the brief), for appellants.

George B. Rawlings, of Boston, Mass. (Herbert B. Barlow, of Providence, R. I., and William F. Hall, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellees.

Before MORTON, Circuit Judge, and MORRIS and McLELLAN, District Judges.

MORRIS, District Judge.

This is a suit charging infringement of Ridges design patent, No. 90,142, dated June 13, 1933, for a vanity case, owned by the Illinois Watch Case Company, one of the plaintiffs, appellants. The Elgin American Company, the remaining plaintiff, appellant, is the exclusive licensee under said patent.

The defendants are the Hingeco Manufacturing Company, Inc., and Fritz R. Johnson and Christopher L. Migliaccio, individually and as copartners...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases