1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 83 F.2d
  5. 83 F.2d 1006 (1936)
 

BARWICK v. TOOMEY

No. 5865.

83 F.2d 1006 (1936)

BARWICK, Inc., Claimant of THE Steamtug BARWICK, Appellant, v. William F. TOOMEY, etc.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

May 19, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles W. Hagen, of New York City (Henry C. Eidenbach, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

McDermott, Enright & Carpenter, of Jersey City, N. J., and Macklin, Brown, Lenahan & Speer, of New York City (Horace L. Cheyney, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before BUFFINGTON, DAVIS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This admiralty collision case depends on its own particular facts and the substantive questions of fact involved are: Did the tug Barwick, in passing out of the pier, strike the motor vessel Spray, lying at rest, and, if so, did the blow cause the damage found, assessed, and decreed? After hearing the witnesses of both sides, the court entered a decree against the Barwick and referred the case to a master to ascertain damages, who heard testimony and reported...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases