1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 84 F.2d
  5. 84 F.2d 966 (1936)
 

MURRELL v. SNEAD & CO.

No. 5961.

84 F.2d 966 (1936)

MURRELL v. SNEAD & CO. et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

June 24, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew J. Whinery, of Newark, N. J., for appellant.

Wall, Haight, Carey & Hartpence and Albert C. Wall, all of Jersey City, N. J., for appellees.

Before BUFFINGTON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and DICKINSON, District Judge.

DICKINSON, District Judge.

This is an action at law. It is really an action of account. Because of this feature the trial court sent the accounting to a referee. The referee made a report finding the sum of $10,221.26 to be due by Snead & Co. The case in its procedural features is complicated by a circumstance. Murrell and Knight had a joint claim against Snead & Co., their employers, for commissions. The sum due, if any, could be determined only by an accounting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases