1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 83 F.2d
  5. 83 F.2d 928 (1936)
 

IN RE KLEINE

Patent Appeal No. 3646.

83 F.2d 928 (1936)

In re KLEINE et al.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

June 8, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Potter, Pierce & Scheffler, of Washington, D. C. (Charles H. Potter and John S. Lachowicz, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellants.

R. F. Whitehead, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

BLAND, Associate Judge.

All the claims of appellants' application for a patent relating to a method of spinning viscose silk were rejected by the Primary Examiner of the United States Patent Office, in view of the prior art, which rejection, upon appeal, was affirmed by the Board of Appeals.

Before the Board, appellants requested a reconsideration of its decision, and, the same being granted, a second decision was by it rendered. For the purposes of appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases