1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 10 F.Supp.
  5. 10 F.Supp. 988 (1935)
 

HERCULES OIL CO. v. THOMPSON

Nos. 507, 508.

10 F.Supp. 988 (1935)

HERCULES OIL CO. v. THOMPSON et al. GEORGE C. PETERSON CO. v. SAME.

District Court, W. D. Texas, Austin Division.

April 29, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F. W. Fischer, of Tyler, Tex., for complainants Hercules Oil Co. and George C. Peterson Co.

William McCraw, Atty. Gen., W. J. Holt and William C. Davis, Asst. Attys. Gen., and Claude Pollard, of Austin, Tex. (Maurice Cheek, of Fort Worth, Tex., of counsel), for defendant railroad companies.

G. B. Ross, of Galveston, Tex., for G. C. & S. F. Ry. Co.

R. H. Kelley, of Houston, Tex., for trustees, International-Great Northern Railroad Company.

Mastin G. White, of Washington, D. C., for Atty. Gen. of the United States.

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge, and WEST and KENNERLY, District Judges.

PER CURIAM.

These suits, like Melton's, involve the tender or permit rules and regulations of the Commission. As Melton does, these plaintiffs claim that they acquired the products of crude oil involved in the suits before December 5, when the regulations complained of were first adopted. As Melton does, they claim that the regulations and the statutes operate to deprive them of their property without due process of law. The same general claim is made in these suits...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases