LENROOT, Associate Judge.
The Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirmed a decision of the examiner rejecting claims 5, 6, 7, 9, and 11 of appellant's application for lack of invention in view of the prior art. So far as appears from the record, no claims were allowed. From said decision of the Board of Appeals appellant took this appeal.
Claims 5, 6, and 7 are apparatus claims, and 9 and 11 are process claims. Claims 5, 7, and 9 are illustrative...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.