1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 11 F.Supp.
  5. 11 F.Supp. 854 (1935)
 

UNION SIMPLEX TRAIN CONTROL CO. v. GENERAL RY. SIGNAL CO.

No. 1572-1.

11 F.Supp. 854 (1935)

UNION SIMPLEX TRAIN CONTROL CO., Inc., v. GENERAL RY. SIGNAL CO. et al.

District Court, W. D. New York.

July 9, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donovan & Raichle, of Buffalo, N. Y. (Frank Raichle and Albert Henry, both of Buffalo, N. Y., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Harris, Beach, Folger, Bacon & Keating, of Rochester, N. Y., and Edwards, Bower & Pool, of New York City (Clifton V. Edwards and Frank A. Bower, both of New York City, and Neil D. Preston, of Rochester, N. Y., of counsel), for defendants.

KNIGHT, District Judge.

This is a patent suit for infringement brought by Union Simplex Train Control Company, Inc., against the General Railway Signal Company, as manufacturer, and the New York Central Railroad Company, as customer and user. The patents involved are No. 1,374,954, letters patent issued April 19, 1921, and patent No. 1,470,107, letters patent issued October 9, 1923. The only claims controverted are claim 4 of the first-numbered patent and claim 11...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases