1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 79 F.2d
  5. 79 F.2d 738 (1935)
 

IN RE HENSELMAN.

No. 6773.

79 F.2d 738 (1935)

In re HENSELMAN. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO. v. OREBAUGH.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

November 12, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry B. Street, of Cincinnati, Ohio (Harmon, Colston, Goldsmith & Hoadly, of Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.

C. Luther Swaim, of Wilmington, Ohio (H. G. Cartwright, of Wilmington, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee.

Before MOORMAN, HICKS, and SIMONS, Circuit Judges.

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

Appeal of Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Inc. (herein called Goodyear), from an order of the District Court confirming an order of the referee denying in part the petition of appellant for the reclamation of certain automobile tires, tubes, wheels, etc.

For a number of years prior to September 21, 1932, Roy W. Henselman, bankrupt, had been a dealer in automobile tires and other motor accessories in Wilmington, Ohio. He purchased...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases