1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 78 F.2d
  5. 78 F.2d 720 (1935)
 

NAM v. BRYAN

No. 7302.

78 F.2d 720 (1935)

DANG NAM v. BRYAN.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 8, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. J. Botts, of Honolulu, T. H. (Herbert Chamberlin, of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellant.

Ingram M. Stainback, U. S. Atty., and Willson C. Moore, Asst. U. S. Atty., and Ernest J. Hover, U. S. Dept. of Labor, all of Honolulu, T. H., for appellee.

Before WILBUR and GARRECHT, Circuit Judges.

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

After the decision in this case (C. C. A.) 74 F.2d 379, the appellee calls our attention, by way of petition for rehearing, to our lack of jurisdiction of appeal based upon our decision in Bryan v. Fumio Arai (C. C. A.) 64 F.2d 954, holding that the time fixed by rule of the District Court in Hawaii controlled the time and method of appeal; that this rule required the petition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases