PER CURIAM.
In their petition for rehearing in the above-entitled cause, filed June 26, 1935, counsel for appellant brought to the attention of the court the fact that in its decision of June 12, 1935, the court stated that "appellant alleged ownership and registration of the trade-marks `Oil-O-Matic' and `Dist-O-Matic,' for use on electrically operated and thermostatically controlled liquid-fuel-burning devices."
It appears from the record that appellant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
