VOGTLANDISCHE MASCHINEN-FABRIK v. PARADIS


11 F.Supp. 759 (1935)

VOGTLANDISCHE MASCHINEN-FABRIK v. PARADIS et al. ZAHN v. SAME.

District Court, D. New Jersey.

June 26, 1935.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Max D. Ordmann, of New York City, for plaintiffs.

Meyer D. Siegel, of New York City, for defendants.


CLARK, District Judge.

This litigation involves four patents in the art of embroidery machinery. Three of the patents had expired at the time of the suit, and the fourth seemed to the court rather limited in scope. The plaintiff is a German company and manufactures, as we understand it, a substantial portion of the world's lace-making and embroidery machinery. The record disclosed what seemed a deliberate attempt at patent evasion. Its character undoubtedly aroused...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases