IN RE KELLY SPRINGFIELD TIRE CO.

No. 8139.

13 F.Supp. 724 (1935)

IN RE KELLY SPRINGFIELD TIRE CO.

District Court, D. Maryland.

November 22, 1935.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Venable, Baetjer & Howard, of Baltimore, Md. (by Harry N. Baetjer and Stuart S. Janney, Jr., both of Baltimore, Md.), for trustees.

Gleason, McLanahan, Merritt & Ingraham, of New York City (by Scott McLanahan, of New York City), for debtor.

Eben J. D. Cross, of Baltimore, Md., and Chaffee, Dawson & Shealy, of New York City (by Reed B. Dawson, of New York City), for Braden Preference Stockholders' Committee.

Stern & McGivney, of New York City (by Walter T. Stern, of New York City), for Stratton Noteholders' Committee.

Engelhard, Pollak, Pitcher, Stern & Clarke, of New York City (by Stanley Clarke, of New York City), for Levy Noteholders' Committee.

Alfred F. Ritter, of Brooklyn, N. Y., for Guttman Preference Stockholders' Committee.

Merritt Lane, of Newark, N. J., for receivers appointed by Court of Chancery of New Jersey.

Moses & Singer, of New York City (by Henry Singer, of New York City), for Public Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of New York.

Edwin A. Falk, of New York City, for receivers appointed by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and Joseph R. Truesdale, counsel.

Swiger, King & Chambers, of New York City (by Robert N. King, of New York City), for Common Stockholders' Committee.

William Harris, of Newark, N. J., White & Case, of New York City (by W. S. Tozer, of New York City), Pitney, Hardin & Skinner, of Newark, N. J. (by Waldron M. Ward, of Newark, N. J.), Krause, Hirsch & Levin, of New York City (by George C. Levin, of New York City), Lindabury, Depue & Faulks, of Newark, N. J. (by James E. M. Tams, of Newark, N. J.), Austrian & Lance, of New York City (by Saul J. Lance, of New York City), David A. Robb and Albert A. Doub, both of Cumberland, Md., and Harry O. Levin, of Baltimore, Md., on their own behalf.


CHESNUT, District Judge.

We have now reached the final stage of the matter of the reorganization of the Kelly Springfield Tire Company — the determination of the amount of allowances of certain claims for administration expenses. Notice of a hearing on these claims was duly given and on November 6 and 7, 1935, the matter was heard in Court for two full days. Numerous claimants appeared and testified in person with respect to the allowances requested, and counsel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases