1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 77 F.2d
  5. 77 F.2d 643 (1935)
 

IN RE TAYLOR

Patent Appeal No. 3519.

77 F.2d 643 (1935)

In re TAYLOR et al.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

June 10, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fay, Oberlin & Fay, of Cleveland, Ohio (Jno. F. Oberlin, O. C. Limbach, and A. S. Nelson, all of Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel), for appellants.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.

The present appeal is from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, which decision affirmed the decision of the Primary Examiner in rejecting claims 51, 52, 53, 54, and 55 of appellants' application for a patent upon certain alleged improvements in coated electrodes for arc-welding. The rejected claims are as follows:

"51. As an article of manufacture for arc-welding usage, a metal rod having an adherent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases