PIERCE-ARROW MOTOR CAR CO. v. UNITED STATES

No. L — 488.

11 F.Supp. 60 (1935)

PIERCE-ARROW MOTOR CAR CO. v. UNITED STATES.

Court of Claims.

June 3, 1935.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Covington, Burling & Rublee, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

George H. Foster, of Washington, D. C., and Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Herbert E. Carnes, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for the United States.

Before BOOTH, Chief Justice, LITTLETON, WHALEY, WILLIAMS, and GREEN, Judges.


LITTLETON, Judge.

The question in this case concerns the value at which certain automobiles of a discontinued model, which plaintiff had on hand at December 31, 1920, should be included in its inventory of that date.

During 1920 and for several years prior thereto plaintiff manufactured a certain type of automobile known as "model 38." In 1920 it began the manufacture of a new model known as "model 32" to take the place of model 38, and in October or early...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases