PER CURIAM.
The judgment against Erickson appears to us justified. He was driving a motorcar at a speed of at least twenty-five miles an hour through a village at night in a thick snowstorm, when by his own statement he could not see ahead more than sixty or seventy feet. That meant that he had less than two seconds in which to stop. He struck a car at rest with its tail light on, and drove it forward twenty feet. "Gross negligence," as the courts of Vermont have...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
