1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 10 F.Supp.
  5. 10 F.Supp. 642 (1935)
 

LESS CAR LOAD LOTS CO. v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO.

10 F.Supp. 642 (1935)

LESS CAR LOAD LOTS CO. et al. v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO.

District Court, S. D. New York.

May 2, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lord, Day & Lord, of New York City (Edwin S. Clarkson, of Washington, D. C., and Parker McCollester, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Burlingham, Veeder, Fearey, Clark & Hupper, of New York City (Henry N. Paul and Henry N. Paul, Jr., both of Philadelphia, Pa., and Ray Rood Allen, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

My decision in this case is that the bill of complaint be dismissed, with costs, on the ground that the claims on which it is founded are invalid for want of invention.

I. This cause is based on the following claims of three hitherto unadjudicated patents: Claims 12 to 22, inclusive, of reissue patent No. Re. 16,073, claim 6 of United States patent No. 1,564,285, and claim 9, of United States patent No. 1,650,661.

There is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases