BLAND, Associate Judge.
Appellant has here appealed from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, which affirmed the decision of the Primary Examiner in denying all the claims, 6, 10, 11, and 12, of appellant's application for a patent on differential mechanism. Claim 12 is illustrative, and follows:
"12. A differential mechanism comprising a casing consisting of two opposed duplicate sections having annular end faces in complemental...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.