1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 77 F.2d
  5. 77 F.2d 501 (1935)
 

IN RE HUDDLESTON

Patent Appeal No. 3516.

77 F.2d 501 (1935)

In re HUDDLESTON et al.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

June 3, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles E. Riordon and C. Russell Riordon, both of Washington, D. C. (William H. Maxwell, of Los Angeles, Cal., and Edgar J. Clarkson, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellants.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

BLAND, Associate Judge.

From the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming that of the examiner, rejecting claims 63 to 71, inclusive, of appellants' application for a patent for an oil well tool, appellants have appealed here.

The claims were rejected upon the ground that they did not read upon appellants' disclosure.

Claims 63 and 64 are claims 1 and 2, respectively, of the patent to Stephan, No. 1,794,991, of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases