SATTERWHITE v. HARRIMAN NAT. BANK & TRUST CO.


13 F.Supp. 493 (1935)

SATTERWHITE v. HARRIMAN NAT. BANK & TRUST CO. OF CITY OF NEW YORK et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

December 2, 1935.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gleason, McLanahan, Merritt & Ingraham, of New York City (Burgess Osterhout, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

O'Brien, Boardman, Hewitt, Memhard & Early, of New York City (David Asch, of New York City, of counsel), for defendants Harriman National Bank & Trust Co. and Frederick V. Goess, as receiver.


WOOLSEY, District Judge.

The exceptions of the plaintiff and of the defendants are hereby overruled. The special master's report is in all respects confirmed and approved, and is hereby adopted as the opinion of the court in this aspect of the cause.

I. This opinion by the special master, Edward W. Bourne, Esq., rendered October 15, 1935, is as follows:

On April 26, 1932, the plaintiff borrowed $300,000 from the defendant the Harriman National Bank...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases