1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 10 F.Supp.
  5. 10 F.Supp. 436 (1935)
 

PITZER TRANSFER CORPORATION v. NORFOLK & W. RY. CO.

No. 5450.

10 F.Supp. 436 (1935)

PITZER TRANSFER CORPORATION et al. v. NORFOLK & W. RY. CO. et al.

District Court, D. Maryland.

March 28, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Paul Smith, of Baltimore, Md., and Charles E. Cotterill, of New York City, for plaintiffs.

W. Ainsworth Parker, of Baltimore, Md., and John C. Donnally, Legal Department, Virginian Ry. Co., and D. Lynch Younger, both of Washington, D. C., for defendants.

CHESNUT, District Judge.

The question of law presented at this time in the above case relates to the authority of the Interstate Commerce Commission to make a reparation award in favor of the plaintiffs against the defendants for alleged excessive rates collected on coal shipments from West Virginia and Virginia points to Roanoke, Virginia.

The amount awarded by the Commission to the Pitzer Transfer Corporation against the Norfolk & Western Railway was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases