LUNATI v. PACIFIC HYDRAULIC EQUIPMENT

No. 551.

14 F.Supp. 421 (1935)

LUNATI et al. v. PACIFIC HYDRAULIC EQUIPMENT, Inc.

District Court, W. D. Washington, S. D.

November 22, 1935.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Williams, Bradbury, McCaleb & Hinkle, of Chicago, Ill., and Battle, Hulbert, Helsell & Bettens, of Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs.

Raymond D. Ogden and Ward Wm. Roney, both of Seattle, Wash., for defendant.


CUSHMAN, District Judge (after stating the facts as above).

Upon the showing made, the court will assume for present purposes the validity of these claims.

There remains therefore for determination the question of whether infringement has, to the necessary degree of certainty, been shown. The determination of this question depends upon the range of equivalents covered by the patent.

The elements of the combination of the Lunati patent were old, but...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases