1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 79 F.2d
  5. 79 F.2d 336 (1935)
 

ANDERSON v. ST. LOUIS COKE & IRON CORPORATION

No. 5684.

79 F.2d 336 (1935)

ANDERSON et al. v. ST. LOUIS COKE & IRON CORPORATION et al. (EVANS, Intervener).

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Rehearing Denied September 9, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ford W. Thompson, of St. Louis, Mo., for appellants.

Daniel O. Hastings and Harry W. Lunger, both of Wilmington, Del., Joseph T. Davis, of St. Louis, Mo., and Hastings, Stockly & Duffy, of Wilmington, Del., for appellees.

Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

As stated by the court below: "The crucial question is whether the Coke Corporation received fair consideration for its assets. It is unnecessary to analyze the mass of balance sheets, reports, and financial statements in evidence. It is sufficient to point out a few outstanding facts." 9 F.Supp. 69, 73. But notwithstanding the court's statement that it was unnecessary to thus analyze balance sheets...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases