1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 76 F.2d
  5. 76 F.2d 300 (1935)
 

IN RE FITZGERALD

Patent Appeal No. 3470.

76 F.2d 300 (1935)

In re FITZGERALD.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 8, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sturtevant & Mason, of Washington, D. C. (Eugene G. Mason and Herbert H. Porter, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

BLAND, Associate Judge.

The alleged invention involved in this appeal relates to an electrical juice extractor and mixer, used in the preparation of foods in the kitchen. Applicant states that it may also be used as a grinder or buffeter.

The machine comprises a base upon which is an upstanding post. Adjustably fastened to the post is an electric motor assembly, at one end of which is provision for attaching suitable tools for performing the functions aforesaid...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases