WHITALL-TATUM v. CORNING GLASS WORKS

No. 1879.

11 F.Supp. 338 (1935)

WHITALL-TATUM v. CORNING GLASS WORKS (two cases).

District Court, W. D. New York.

May 21, 1935.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Byrnes, Stebbins & Blenko, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Bean, Brooks, Buckley & Bean, of Buffalo, N. Y. (Alan F. Garner, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for defendant.


KNIGHT, District Judge.

The suit is for patent infringement. Issue was joined by an answer denying infringement and the validity of the patent. The answer asks no affirmative relief and sets up no counterclaim. Interrogatories and answers were filed by both parties. No further proceedings were had until plaintiff filed notice of motion to dismiss without prejudice, on payment of costs. Thereafter defendant filed notice of motion to take testimony abroad and also de...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases