1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 77 F.2d
  5. 77 F.2d 246 (1935)
 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. MAISEL TRADING POST

No. 976.

77 F.2d 246 (1935)

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. MAISEL TRADING POST, Inc.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

May 1, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugene W. Burr, of Washington, D. C. (William T. Kelley, Chief Counsel, and Martin A. Morrison, Asst. Chief Counsel, for Federal Trade Commission, both of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for petitioner.

John F. Simms, of Albuquerque, N. M. (Donald M. Bushnell, of Albuquerque, N. M., on the brief), for respondent.

Harris K. Lyle, of Gallup, N. M., for Indian Traders' Ass'n, amicus curiæ.

William C. Lewis, of Oklahoma City, Okl. (Harry W. Blair, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Charles E. Collett, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), as amici curiæ.

Before LEWIS and McDERMOTT, Circuit Judges, and KENNEDY, District Judge.

KENNEDY, District Judge.

This proceeding was instituted by the Federal Trade Commission under the Federal Trade Commission Act, as set out in 15 USCA § 45. The proceeding was originally commenced by a complaint filed in May, 1932, in which the Commission charged in substance that the respondent while engaged in interstate commerce, by the use of misleading and deceptive terms in connection with the sale of certain types of Indian jewelry, indulged in unfair methods...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases