1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 75 F.2d
  5. 75 F.2d 214 (1935)
 

IN RE WICKERSHAM

Patent Appeal No. 3421.

75 F.2d 214 (1935)

In re WICKERSHAM.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

February 25, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Baldwin & Wight, of Washington, D. C. (Donald M. Wight, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

BLAND, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming the decision of the Examiner, denying patentability, in view of the prior art, of claims numbered 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 31, 37, 38, 40, and 41 of appellant's application for a patent for improvements in threshing machines.

The Primary Examiner allowed seven claims presented in appellant's application. The Board of Appeals allowed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases