1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 79 F.2d
  5. 79 F.2d 177 (1935)
 

UNITED STATES v. METROPOLITAN BODY CO.

No. 375.

79 F.2d 177 (1935)

UNITED STATES, for Use of MENGEL BODY CO., Inc., et al. v. METROPOLITAN BODY CO. et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

September 16, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marsh, Stoddard & Day, of Bridgeport, Conn., and Watrous, Hewitt, Gumbart & Corbin, of New Haven, Conn. (Philo C. Calhoun, of Bridgeport, Conn., and Chas. A. Watrous, of New Haven, Conn., of counsel), for appellants.

Pullman & Comley, of Bridgeport, Conn. (Arthur M. Comley, of Bridgeport, Conn., of counsel), for appellant Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

CHASE, Circuit Judge.

This suit was brought by the plaintiff for the use of Mengel Body Company, Inc., a New Jersey corporation, and the Haskelite Manufacturing Corporation, a New York corporation, and such other creditors of the Metropolitan Body Company as might intervene, against the last-mentioned company, a Connecticut corporation, and the Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Company, a corporation organized under the laws of Massachusetts, upon a performance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases