1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 10 F.Supp.
  5. 10 F.Supp. 241 (1935)
 

ACTIVATED SLUDGE v. FILTROS, INC.

No. 1892.

10 F.Supp. 241 (1935)

ACTIVATED SLUDGE, Inc., v. FILTROS, Inc.

District Court, W. D. New York.

March 23, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Van Voohris' Sons, of Rochester, N. Y., and Williams, Rich & Morse, of New York City, for the motion.

Whitman, Dey & Nier, of Rochester, N. Y., and Williams, Bradbury, McCaleb & Hinkle, of Chicago, Ill., opposed.

RIPPEY, District Judge.

This action was commenced September 14, 1934, to recover damages and profits resulting from and injunctive relief against defendant's infringement of United States letters patent (1) No. 1,247,540 issued November 20, 1917, (2) No. 1,247,542 issued November 20, 1917, (3) No. 1,247,543 issued November 20, 1917, and reissue thereof No. 15,140 dated July 5, 1921, (4) No. 1,282,587 issued October 22, 1918, (5) No. 1,286,017 issued November 28, 1918...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases