IN RE PROCESSING TAX CASE

No. 518.

13 F.Supp. 218 (1935)

In re PROCESSING TAX CASE, and 43 other cases.

District Court, W. D. Texas, Austin Division.

December 4, 1935.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Birkhead, Beckmann, Stanard & Vance, of San Antonio, Tex., McCormick, Bromberg, Leftwich & Carrington, of Dallas, Tex., Fulbright, Crooker & Freeman, of Houston, Tex., Turney, Burges, Culwell & Pollard, of El Paso, Tex., Andrews, Kelley, Kurth & Campbell, of Houston, Tex., and George M. Mayer, of San Antonio, Tex., for complainants.

W. R. Smith, Jr., Dist. Atty., and Henry W. Moursund, Ass't Dist. Atty., both of San Antonio, Tex., and Wm. C. Jennings, Sp. Asst. to the Atty. Gen., for respondents.


McMILLAN, District Judge.

In all of these cases preliminary injunctions have been granted restraining the collector from collecting these so-called processing taxes, conditioned upon the complainant's depositing, subject to the orders of the court, sums in cash sufficient to insure the government in the collection of its impositions if the act is finally held to be valid.

The respondent now moves to dissolve these interlocutory injunctions and dismiss the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases