1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 10 F.Supp.
  5. 10 F.Supp. 219 (1935)
 

ROKAP CORPORATION v. LAMM

No. 2163.

10 F.Supp. 219 (1935)

ROKAP CORPORATION v. LAMM et al.

District Court, D. Maryland.

March 1, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Wase, of Baltimore, Md., and A. D. Caesar and C. W. Rivise, both of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Emanuel E. Ottenheimer, of Baltimore, Md., Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City, and Herbert J. Jacobi (of Jacobi & Jacobi), of Washington, D. C., for defendants.

CHESNUT, District Judge.

This case presents a suit in equity for alleged patent infringement in the usual form. The patent involved, No. 1,830,768, was issued November 10, 1931, to Isaac M. Rod, of Dublin, Pennsylvania, on application filed January 5, 1927, and has been assigned to the plaintiff corporation, which was formed by the patentee, Rod, and one Kaplan. The patent is a method and product, and not a machine, patent. It contains nine claims of which Nos. 4...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases