1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 13 F.Supp.
  5. 13 F.Supp. 185 (1935)
 

HUMIDITY CONTROL CO. v. MENGEL BODY CO.

13 F.Supp. 185 (1935)

HUMIDITY CONTROL CO. v. MENGEL BODY CO.

District Court, D. New Jersey.

September 23, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Briesen & Schrenk, of New York City (Hans V. Briesen, of New York City, and G. B. Schley, V. A. Trask, and T. P. Jenkins, all of Indianapolis, Ind., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Backes & Backes, of Trenton, N. J. (Virgil H. Lockwood, Ralph G. Lockwood, Elmer L. Goldsmith, and Thomas B. Huestis, all of Indianapolis, Ind., of counsel), for defendant.

FORMAN, District Judge.

Suit was brought by the plaintiff to enjoin the defendant from its patents No. 1,490,560 and 1,513,727 through the use of a lumber drying process and apparatus called a "Cyclspray," allegedly invented by one Frederick W. Rubin, and manufactured and sold to the defendant by the Kiln Supply & Manufacturing Company. The plaintiff's apparatus and process was invented by Arthur E. Krick and is known as a Moistat. This was held to be infringed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases