CANISTER COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

No. 5745.

78 F.2d 1013 (1935)

CANISTER COMPANY, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

July 23, 1935.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wm. R. Spofford and Frederic L. Ballard, both of Philadelphia, Pa., and Fred A. Woodis, of Washington, D. C. (Speer & Woodis, of Washington, D. C., and Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, of Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for petitioner.

Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Lucius A. Buck and James W. Morris, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

This case turns on a question of fact; namely, whether the transaction in question was a bona fide sale which gave this taxpayer appellant a right, within the meaning of section 23 (f) of the Revenue Act of 1928 (26 USCA § 2023 (f), to claim the resultant loss as a deduction from its gross income.

The facts are so fully stated and discussed in the opinion of the Tax Board as to obviate a restatement. That tribunal held the proofs showed the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases