PER CURIAM.
Upon the plaintiff's petition for reargument as to reissue patent No. 18,322, we have again carefully considered the question of validity, and we adhere to our former conclusion. Even if Elliott alone is not enough to anticipate claim 1, we cannot hold that invention was involved in making the adjustments necessary for the patent in suit out of parts shown in Brownson, Pitney, Elliott, and Kreuger's first patent. The defendants' new ground, of attack,...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.