GARRETT, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming the decision of the Examiner denying, for want of invention in view of the prior art, the two claims (numbered 9 and 10) of appellant's application for patent entitled "Collision Demonstrating Devices."
Claim 10 is quoted as typical: "10. A device of the character described comprising a support having two designated central lines...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.