1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 10 F.Supp.
  5. 10 F.Supp. 95 (1935)
 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COM'N v. STOCK MARKET FINANCE

10 F.Supp. 95 (1935)

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. STOCK MARKET FINANCE, Inc., et al. SAME v. ROBERT COLLIER & CO. et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

February 14, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John J. Burns, Gen. Counsel, of Washington, D. C. (John T. Callahan, and Edwin Martenet, of New York City, of counsel), for Securities and Exchange Commission.

Abraham C. Berman, of New York City, for Stock Market Finance and Thomas J. Murphy.

Glass & Lynch, of New York City, for John J. Hackett.

Thomas E. Dewey, of New York City, for respondents.

CAFFEY, District Judge.

The suits seek to enjoin alleged violations of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 USCA §§ 77a to 77aa (hereinafter called the Act of 1933), or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 USCA §§ 77b-77e, 77j, 77k, 77m, 77o, 77s, 78a to 78 jj (hereinafter called the Act of 1934). The bill in the first case was brought by the Federal Trade Commission as complainant, pursuant to the power conferred on it by sections 2 (5) and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases