1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 12 F.Supp.
  5. 12 F.Supp. 1007 (1935)
 

DYKEMA v. LIGGETT DRUG CO.

No. 1967.

12 F.Supp. 1007 (1935)

DYKEMA v. LIGGETT DRUG CO., Inc.

District Court, W. D. New York.

November 19, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Locke, Babcock, Hollister & Brown, of Buffalo, N. Y., Byrnes, Stebbins & Blenko, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

Dudley, Stowe & Sawyer, of Buffalo, N. Y., and Watson, Bristol, Johnson & Leavenworth, of New York City, for defendant.

KNIGHT, District Judge.

Plaintiff moves for an order directing the defendant to answer this interrogatory: "Is the defense of this suit being conducted by and at the expense of Vick Chemical Company and are the attorneys acting for the defendant in this suit employed to act in this suit by Vick Chemical Company?"

This court has heretofore passed on the question of the right to an answer to questions to the same effect. Chicago Flexible Shaft Co. v. Neupert...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases