1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 10 F.Supp.
  5. 10 F.Supp. 91 (1935)
 

CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION v. MITCHELL

No. 296.

10 F.Supp. 91 (1935)

CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION v. MITCHELL.

District Court, E. D. Virginia, Alexandria Division.

January 23, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gardner L. Boothe, of Alexandria, Va., Henry G. Hotchkiss, of Washington, D. C., and Cyril Hyde Condon, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Seth W. Richardson, Leo P. Harlow, Marshall H. Lynn, Joseph E. Davies, Raymond N. Beebe, and Adrien F. Busick, all of Washington, D. C., for defendant.

WAY, District Judge.

The declaration in this case alleges, among other things, that the defendant on or about the 3d day of March, 1934, published both orally and in writing the following statements of and concerning the plaintiff:

"(b) The Curtiss-Wright Corporation, New York, N. Y., which comprises the following:

"1. Curtiss Aeroplane and Motor Co., Buffalo, N. Y., airplanes and war planes.

"2. Keystone Aircraft Corporation, Bristol, Pa....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases