1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 77 F.2d
  5. 77 F.2d 930 (1935)
 

DEUTSCH v. BALL

Patent Appeal No. 3485.

77 F.2d 930 (1935)

DEUTSCH et al. v. BALL.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

June 10, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Munn, Anderson, Stanley, Foster & Liddy, of Washington, D. C. (Harry E. Seidel, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellants.

Whittemore, Hulbert, Whittemore & Belknap, of Detroit, Mich. (William H. Gross, of Detroit, Mich., and George A. Degnan, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

BLAND, Associate Judge.

This is an interference proceeding in which appellants have appealed from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office wherein said Board reversed a decision of the Examiner of Interferences and awarded priority of the invention to the appellee. The interference arises between an application of appellants filed March 14, 1932, and an application of appellee filed July 30, 1932. Appellee, being the last to file, is the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases