1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 79 F.2d
  5. 79 F.2d 922 (1935)
 

BLODGETT v. RICHTER

Patent Appeal No. 3541.

79 F.2d 922 (1935)

BLODGETT et al. v. RICHTER.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

November 27, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roberts, Cushman & Woodberry, of Boston, Mass. (Herman T. Gammons and Harold R. Savage, both of Boston, Mass., of counsel), for appellants.

Wright, Brown, Quinby & May, of Boston, Mass. (Nathaniel P. Wharton, of Boston, Mass., of counsel), for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

GARRETT, Associate Judge.

On December 4, 1925, Richter filed an application for patent in the United States Patent Office entitled, "For Cyclic Process of Treating Alkaline Pulps," which was duly prosecuted until a number of claims reached the stage of allowance. It is said in the brief for appellants that this stage was reached April 11, 1930. Richter, however, it is further said in the brief, did not pay the final fee and take the patent, but, on September 26, 1930...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases