BELDING-CORTICELLI LIMITED v. KAUFMAN

No. M-592.

10 F.Supp. 991 (1935)

BELDING-CORTICELLI LIMITED et al. v. KAUFMAN.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

May 9, 1935.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry N. Paul, of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Wesley H. Caldwell, of Philadelphia, Pa., for witnesses.


DICKINSON, District Judge.

Ignoring the distinction among letters rogatory, commissions dedimus potestatem, and other methods of taking testimony by deposition in advance of a trial in open court, we start with the admitted proposition that a court may, in the absence of legislative enactment, enforce the taking of such testimony. When the deposition is taken within the territorial jurisdiction of the court, it may and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases